This one is going to be alone brief post. Came across this interesting property in my advanced solids course, as well.
Consider the square matrix \mathbf{A}. Clearly we can write \mathbf{A} like this
\begin{align*}
\mathbf{A}&=\frac{1}{2}\left(\mathbf{A}+\mathbf{A}+\mathbf{A}^T-\mathbf{A}^T\right)\\
&=\frac{1}{2}\left(\mathbf{A}+\mathbf{A}^T\right)+\frac{1}{2}\left(\mathbf{A}-\mathbf{A}^T\right)
\end{align*}
Let \mathbf{B}=\frac{1}{2}(\mathbf{A}+\mathbf{A}^T) and \mathbf{C}=\frac{1}{2}(\mathbf{A}-\mathbf{A}^T). So \mathbf{A}=\mathbf{B}+\mathbf{C}. Based on the property that (\mathbf{A}+\mathbf{B})^T=\mathbf{A}^T+\mathbf{B}^T it's easy to verify that \mathbf{B} is symmetric (\mathbf{B}=\mathbf{B}^T) and that \mathbf{C} is skew-symmetric (\mathbf{C}=-\mathbf{C}^T). Therefore a solution exists.
But, is this solution unique? Assume we have two solutions: \mathbf{A}=\mathbf{B}_1+\mathbf{C}_1=\mathbf{B}_2+\mathbf{C}_2 where \mathbf{B}_i is symmetric and \mathbf{C}_i is skew-symmetric. Since \mathbf{B}_1+\mathbf{C}_1=\mathbf{B}_2+\mathbf{C}_2 we know that
\mathbf{B}_1-\mathbf{B}_2=\mathbf{C}_2-\mathbf{C}_1
It's easy to show that the sum of two symmetric matrices is symmetric and the sum of two skew-symmetric matrices is skew-symmetric. Therefore, the left hand side is symmetric and the right hand size is skew-symmetric. Because they are equal, it implies that they are both the zero matrix.
\mathbf{B}_1-\mathbf{B}_2=\mathbf{C}_2-\mathbf{C}_1=\mathbf{0}
And lastly, we see that
\mathbf{B}_1=\mathbf{B}_2
\mathbf{C}_1=\mathbf{C}_2
And really, we were looking at the same representation. Therefore, it is unique!
In the course we were really talking about how the displacement gradient \left(\nabla\mathbf{u}\right) is really the sum of the infinitesimal strain tensor \left(\mathbf{\varepsilon}\right) that is symmetric and the infinitesimal rotation tensor \left(\mathbf{\omega}\right) that is skew-symmetric. But the same principle applies to the much easier concept of matrices.
No comments:
Post a Comment